Open Source Democracy

class TraditionalParty:
    def __init__(self):
        self.decisions = []  # Private repository
        self.funding_sources = []  # Hidden from public
        self.decision_process = "black_box"
        self.accountability = None
    
    def make_policy(self, issue):
        # Closed-door meetings
        # No public review process
        # No version control
        # No rollback mechanism
        return self.leader_decides(issue)
    
    def get_transparency(self):
        return "Access Denied: 404 Not Found"

class OpenSourceParty:
    def __init__(self):
        self.repository = "https://github.com/desh/governance"
        self.license = "MIT"  # Maximum freedom
        self.contributors = []  # All citizens can contribute
        self.transparency = "100%"
    
    def make_policy(self, issue):
        # Create feature branch
        branch = self.create_branch(f"policy/{issue}")
        
        # Collaborative development
        draft = self.draft_policy(issue)
        self.request_peer_review(draft)
        
        # Public review process
        feedback = self.collect_public_input(draft)
        refined_policy = self.incorporate_feedback(draft, feedback)
        
        # Testing phase
        test_results = self.run_pilot_program(refined_policy)
        
        # Merge to main if tests pass
        if test_results.success_rate > 0.8:
            return self.merge_to_main(refined_policy)
        else:
            return self.iterate_and_improve(refined_policy)

def test_healthcare_policy():
    policy = HealthcarePolicy()
    
    # Test coverage requirements
    assert policy.coverage_percentage >= 95
    
    # Test cost constraints
    assert policy.cost_per_citizen <= budget_limit
    
    # Test accessibility
    assert policy.rural_access_time <= 60  # minutes
    
    # Test quality metrics
    assert policy.satisfaction_score >= 4.0  # out of 5

def test_policy_integration():
    healthcare = HealthcarePolicy()
    education = EducationPolicy()
    
    # Test resource allocation doesn't conflict
    total_budget = healthcare.budget + education.budget
    assert total_budget <= national_budget
    
    # Test complementary effects
    health_education_synergy = calculate_synergy(healthcare, education)
    assert health_education_synergy > 0

def test_citizen_experience():
    citizen = CitizenProfile(location="rural", income="low")
    
    # Test policy accessibility
    services = get_available_services(citizen)
    assert len(services) >= minimum_service_count
    
    # Test service quality
    satisfaction = measure_satisfaction(citizen, services)
    assert satisfaction >= target_satisfaction_score

deployment_stages = [
    {
        'name': 'pilot',
        'scope': '1% of population',
        'duration': '3 months',
        'success_criteria': 'satisfaction > 80%'
    },
    {
        'name': 'regional',
        'scope': '10% of population', 
        'duration': '6 months',
        'success_criteria': 'satisfaction > 85%'
    },
    {
        'name': 'national',
        'scope': '100% of population',
        'duration': 'ongoing',
        'success_criteria': 'satisfaction > 90%'
    }
]

class CommunityGovernance:
    def __init__(self):
        self.voting_power = self.calculate_voting_power()
        self.decision_makers = self.select_maintainers()
    
    def calculate_voting_power(self, contributor):
        factors = {
            'expertise_level': contributor.domain_knowledge,
            'contribution_history': contributor.commit_count,
            'peer_recognition': contributor.review_score,
            'stake_in_outcome': contributor.affected_by_policy
        }
        return weighted_average(factors)
    
    def select_maintainers(self):
        candidates = self.get_eligible_candidates()
        return self.community_vote(candidates, method='ranked_choice')